Harmonization and Financial Reporting Coursework

Harmonization and monetary Reporting - Coursework ExampleThat seemed far from a reliable thing last spring, w. hen the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) solicited comments on the AICPAs sensitive comprehensive illustration f business describe and so endowed it with a faint whiff f reality. The quantify seemed right. At the Securities and Exchange Commission ( minute base), commissioner Steven M.H. Wallman was already lending tacit support to the concept by produce articles and hosting conferences on his own ideas for an expanded system that would include improved disclosure f intangible assets. Meanwhile, SEC prexy Arthur Levitt had unsloped successfully lobbied the Financial Accounting Foundation (FAF) to give one f the place held by the Financial Executives Institute (FEI) to a public-sector trustee. The FAF oversees FASB, f course, and what small voice preparers had in directing the views f FASB was further diminished. Finally, many preparers had concluded tha t FASB, as demonstrated by the onslaught f new standards it had issued in recent years, was hardly worried about complaints that financial executives were overburdened.And yet, like a baseball team that has just captured a wild-card ticket to the playoffs, the preparer community appears to have enjoyed a turn f luck. After reviewing the AICPAs arguments for a new reporting model and listening to comments from users and preparers f financial statements, both in written and oral testimony, FASB chairman Dennis Beresford has concluded that, for now anyway, its just too much. While it is dangerous to generalize about much(prenominal) letter and meetings, Beresford says, my feeling is that most f our constituents arent interested in wholesale changes to our current financial reporting system. And FASB, it seems, is not interested in tackling any major overhaul f the status quo. My prediction, says Beresford, is that FASB is going to be quite a cautious about expanding its role beyond t raditional financial statement matters. The Complicating Factors FASB has good reasons for tabling the issue. For one thing, Beresfords second five-year term expires in June, and many observers think the Board will be averse to take on any major new projects until a new chairman is installed. In addition, FASBs current agenda is jam-packed with such projects as derivatives disclosure, segment reporting, and comprehensive income. While FASB agreed to review the future f financial reporting as part f its first strategic plan, adopted last April, so far it has been reluctant to for-realize the creation f a new financial reporting model as a working(a) project. And whatever decision is made about the future f reporting has to be made with an bosom toward possible U.S. acceptance f new international accounting standards--which isnt expected for at least some(prenominal) more years. All in all, this is not what the AICPA had in mind when its Special Committee on Financial Reporting, c haired by Edmund Jenkins, issued its voluminous report a little over two years ago. The committee state then that current financial statements were no longer providing users with the information they needed to make smart trust and investment decisions, and were