Courtroom Workgroup Essay

The purpose of court is true(p) forward, to bring a conflict to justice. As simple as that sounds there be many another(prenominal) more roles than a judge and a jury. Bringing a conflict to justice is a group effort, that team is known as a courtroom work group. One of the major roles of this team is the prosecutor. The prosecutor is the police forceyer representing the resign in one of the many trials on hand. With the excessive tots of trials, the courtroom has a process called brutal justice funnel. This process helps minimize the amount of trials that are pending.The court room work group is a team of separates processing the trial. Several groups make up the courtroom work groups. The criminal prosecutor, defense attorney, and a judicial officer make up the most common courtroom work group. Each individual has specific duties as part of the group. The judge is responsible for issuing warrants towards a defendant, determining bail amount or if bail is granted or denied , and presiding over trials. Defense attorney are appointed to the defendant. These attorneys layabout be privately retained which can be costly. Prosecuting attorneys known as the prosecutors or District Attorneys represents the state in criminal cases. There are other work group members such as the law clerks, court clerks, administrators, jurors, witnesses, police officers, and on occasion the news media.The criminal justice can be a long everlasting process. To help speed up the processing of the increasing number of cases that rise all minute, a relationship forms in courtrooms between the main groups in the system, including the judge, defense counsel and prosecutor. The courtroom workgroup shows singular explanatory power in overburdened courts dealing with large caseloads. I believe that there are certain changes that can be made to thecourtroom. Having higher security for more violent offenders should be fetching into precaution. Some jurors need to take into considerat ion the evidence that is being brought up upon them. I know of many cases that the defendant is declared guilty then later found out they were innocent. There will in like manner always be the criminals let go because of a lack of evidence to convince a jury.